Comments on: Getting FOAF files from the desktop to the Web http://dowhatimean.net/2007/02/getting-foaf-files-from-the-desktop-to-the-web Richard Cyganiak's Weblog Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:12:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Richard Cyganiak http://dowhatimean.net/2007/02/getting-foaf-files-from-the-desktop-to-the-web#comment-41626 Richard Cyganiak Fri, 09 Feb 2007 07:14:57 +0000 http://dowhatimean.net/2007/02/getting-foaf-files-from-the-desktop-to-the-web#comment-41626 <p>Dan, good point about WebDAV using HTTP PUT. I should have written, “HTTP PUT in its original simple non-WebDAV form has failed.”</p> Dan, good point about WebDAV using HTTP PUT. I should have written, “HTTP PUT in its original simple non-WebDAV form has failed.”

]]> By: Dan Connolly http://dowhatimean.net/2007/02/getting-foaf-files-from-the-desktop-to-the-web#comment-41580 Dan Connolly Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:57:20 +0000 http://dowhatimean.net/2007/02/getting-foaf-files-from-the-desktop-to-the-web#comment-41580 <p>“Don’t bother. Put foaf.rdf on the server, take foaf.rdf#me as the person’s URI. When this works, <em>then</em> you can think about …” Amen to that.</p> “Don’t bother. Put foaf.rdf on the server, take foaf.rdf#me as the person’s URI. When this works, then you can think about …” Amen to that.

]]> By: Dan Connolly http://dowhatimean.net/2007/02/getting-foaf-files-from-the-desktop-to-the-web#comment-41579 Dan Connolly Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:55:56 +0000 http://dowhatimean.net/2007/02/getting-foaf-files-from-the-desktop-to-the-web#comment-41579 <p>“HTTP PUT has already failed in the marketplace”. baloney. How do you think WebDAV works?</p> “HTTP PUT has already failed in the marketplace”. baloney. How do you think WebDAV works?

]]> By: Danny http://dowhatimean.net/2007/02/getting-foaf-files-from-the-desktop-to-the-web#comment-41539 Danny Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:53:03 +0000 http://dowhatimean.net/2007/02/getting-foaf-files-from-the-desktop-to-the-web#comment-41539 <p>I’m not so sure how much ftp is king any more, with the number of people publishing/blogging through hosted CMSs. Where client posting is available it’s more likely to be the (pretty nasty) XML-RPC-based Blogger and/or Metaweblog APIs. The Atom Protocol looks set to provide a web-friendly alternative, and as you say there is WebDAV. Hmm, APP not yet adopted, XML-RPC is horrid, er…I guess that still means ftp is probably the best bet.</p> <p>foaf.rdf#me - can I put my hcard version there too?</p> I’m not so sure how much ftp is king any more, with the number of people publishing/blogging through hosted CMSs. Where client posting is available it’s more likely to be the (pretty nasty) XML-RPC-based Blogger and/or Metaweblog APIs. The Atom Protocol looks set to provide a web-friendly alternative, and as you say there is WebDAV. Hmm, APP not yet adopted, XML-RPC is horrid, er…I guess that still means ftp is probably the best bet.

foaf.rdf#me - can I put my hcard version there too?

]]>